Category Archives: Blog

Georgia Family Files Asbestos Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson After Losing Mother to Mesothelioma

A grieving Georgia family recently filed an asbestos talcum powder cancer lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson after losing their mother to a battle with mesothelioma in 2017 that they claim was caused by the pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant’s negligence. The family’s lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and its supplier, Imerys Talc USA, comes just shortly after a report by Reuters detailed a review of thousands of internal company documents showing that the defendants knew for decades about asbestos contamination in its talcum powder products.

According to the talcum powder mesothelioma lawsuit, the victim used talc-based products manufactured by Johnson & Johnson and supplied by Imerys Talc USA that were contaminated with deadly asbestos fibers. Despite knowing full well about the presence of asbestos in its talcum powder products and the risks it could pose to consumers, the defendants declined to provide the public with any warnings on the product labels, according to the lawsuit.

The mesothelioma cancer lawsuit is another in an increasingly long list of claims filed against the company by defendants, mostly women, who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma as a result of using Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products. Currently, there are an estimated 12,000 other talcum powder cancer lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson pending in state and federal courts, with several slated for trial in 2019.

Johnson & Johnson has thus far refused to settle any of the lawsuits against it and instead has opted to take the claims in front of juries. A recent report by Reuters claims that the company had testing done, both internally and by outside labs, that showed asbestos contamination in its talc supply. Despite the revelations, Johnson & Johnson continues to maintain that its talc-based products are safe for human consumption and remains steadfast in its denying liability in pending lawsuits.

Both talc and asbestos are naturally occuring minerals, often found in deposits side by side one another. Because of this phenomenon, talc sourcing companies must take great care when mining the talc or otherwise risk asbestos contamination in the supply. Asbestos itself was once commonly used in a variety of industrial and commercial products for its heat resistant properties and ability to be molded into a variety of shapes.

An asbestos talcum powder cancer lawsuit can recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering of living with mesothelioma. In cases in which the victim may have passed away, the law generally gives family members the right to continue the claim on behalf of the deceased and recover damages from negligent partites.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment.

California Jury Hands Down $29 Million Verdict in Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit Trial

An Oakland, California jury recently handed down a substantial $29 million verdict in favor of a female plaintiff who claims she developed a serious form of cancer from carcinogens in talc-based products produced by the defendant, Johnson & Johnson. The plaintiff’s verdict is the latest defeat for the pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant, which is still reeling from several other awards handed down by juries last year totaling more than $5 billion in compensatory and punitive damages.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Alameda County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed mesothelioma as a result of years of exposure to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder, which is made with talc sourced by Italy-based Imerys Talc USA. The talc supplier avoided any liability in the matter due to a recent Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing which Imerys claims is the result of the weight of talcum powder cancer lawsuits filed against it.

Although talc does not contain asbestos itself, the two are both naturally occurring minerals found in deposits side by side one another. If talc suppliers and manufacturers do not take reasonable precautions to separate talc from asbestos and conduct necessary testing, innocent consumers may be exposed to life threatening carcinogens.

With Imerys Talc being tentatively excused from all current talcum powder cancer trials, Johnson & Johnson now faces an estimated 12,700 talc cancer lawsuits as the sole defendant, leaving it potentially liable for billions in total damages. Making matters worse for Johnson & Johnson, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice are both investigating the company over allegations that internal company documents show executives knew for decades about the risk of asbestos exposure but did nothing to warn the public.

The revelations over Johnson & Johnson’s internal communications come after an investigation by Reuters, which analyzed thousands of pages of documents going back decades that seem to show the company knew about its talc testing positive for asbestos. As expected, Johnson & Johnson has denied all the allegations made in the Reuters article and has appealed jury verdicts against it, claiming the science applied to testing its talc-based products is not valid.

In July 2018, a Missouri state jury in St. Louis handed down a massive $4.7 billion verdict on behalf of 22 women and their families who claim they developed various forms of cancer as a result of using Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products like Baby Powder and Shower to Shower. In all of 2018, juries across the country handed down a combined total of over $5 billion in compensation to victims and their families. Johnson & Johnson faces even more scheduled trials in 2019, but does not appear poised to resolve the matters en masse.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

 

California Jury Hears Closing Arguments in Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit

A California jury recently heard closing arguments in an asbestos cancer lawsuit brought by a plaintiff who claims she developed mesothelioma as a result of years of exposure from carcinogens in talc-based products produced by Johnson & Johnson. The trial is one of the first of many the pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant will face this year by itself after codefendant and minerals supplier Imerys Talc USA was dismissed from many of the cases after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in federal court.

According to the asbestos lawsuit, filed in Oakland court, the plaintiff used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder since the 1960s, never knowing it may have been contaminated with deadly asbestos fibers. The plaintiff’s lawyers pointed to Johnson & Johnson internal company documents which allegedly show that the company knew for decades about the presence of the carcinogenic mineral but placed no warnings on labels to inform consumers of the risks.

In its defense, Johnson & Johnson’s lawyers attempted to obfuscate blame by asserting the materials could not be reliable since they were decades old and the authors of those reports were not able to come and testify on the matter. Johnson and Johnson faces an estimated 13,000 other talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuits in state and federal courts across the country brought by victims who claim they suffer from debilitating health conditions as a result of the company knowingly providing a dangerous product.

Although talc does not contain asbestos itself, the two are both naturally occurring minerals often found in deposits next to each other. If talc suppliers do not exercise due caution when mining or processing talc, it may be contaminated with asbestos fibers and potentially harm innocent people. Talc is used in a variety of cosmetics products, particularly in hygiene products traditionally marketed to women and persons of color.

Mesothelioma is one of the most serious health conditions associated with exposure to asbestos. The disease is a rare and deadly type of cancer that grows tumors in thin linings of tissue surrounding vital organs like the lungs, heart, and abdominal cavity. There is no known cure for mesothelioma as of yet, and patients are often left with limited treatment options after a diagnosis is made due to the disease’s latency period, which can last anywhere from 20 to 50 years.

By filing a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, victims and their family members can recover vital compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and other economic damages. Additionally, plaintiffs may be entitled to compensation for the physical pain and suffering of undergoing treatment and living with a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

 

Sixth Talcum Powder Asbestos Cancer Trial Against J&J Set to Begin in California

The sixth talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuit against pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson is set for trial in a matter of days and will take place in a California state court to determine whether or not the company is liable for the victim’s injuries. The mesothelioma cancer lawsuit also names cosmetics company Chanel and talc supplier Imerys Talc USA as defendants for also producing carcinogenic products the plaintiff claims contributed to her terminal cancer diagnosis.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed mesothelioma as a result of years of asbestos exposure from using Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower, along with Chanel’s No. 5 After Bath Powder. The lawsuit claims both the companies’ products were manufactured with talc supplied from Imerys, which the parties knew to be contaminated with asbestos.

Johnson & Johnson faces thousands of other lawsuit across the country in which plaintiffs allege their serious medical conditions, including mesothelioma and other cancers, were caused by talc-based products produced by the company. The talcum powder cancer lawsuits claim Johnson & Johnson and its supplier were fully aware of the dangers posed by its talcum powder products but did not put any warning labels on packaging to alert consumers to the dangers.

Many of the estimated 9,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits allege the female plaintiffs developed ovarian cancer from use of Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products while others allege they developed mesothelioma. Although talc itself does not contain asbestos, the two minerals are naturally occuring and often found in deposits side by side one another. Asbestos has been heavily regulated by federal laws since the 1970s but if talc suppliers do not take special precautions when mining talc, the substance could be contaminated with asbestos.

Asbestos is linked to a whole host of serious health conditions, the most well known of which is mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that commonly affects the thin linings of tissues surrounding vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen. Even as researchers across the world continue to make strides in medical advancements to treat the disease, there is still no known cure for the condition.

By filing an asbestos cancer lawsuit, victims can hold large asbestos companies responsible for their indifference to public safety and send a message the behavior will not be tolerated. Furthermore, a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit can recover lost wages while out of work as well as vital compensation to pay for necessary medical treatment to fight the disease and live a more comfortable, dignified life.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Texas Aircraft Mechanic Files Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit Against Employer and Parts Suppliers

An aircraft mechanic from Texas and his wife recently filed a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit against the husband’s former employer and its parts supplier claiming the defendants are responsible for the victim’s malignant cancer diagnosis. The asbestos cancer lawsuit names Lockheed Martin Corp., 3M Co., and General Dynamics Corp. as parties responsible for the plaintiff’s mesothelioma diagnosis and seeks damages for the victim’s medical bills, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas, the victim worked for approximately 40 years as an aircraft mechanic for Lockheed Martin Corp. after graduating high school in 1963. During that time, he was frequently exposed to deadly levels of asbestos fibers in products used, manufactured, and sold by the defendants.

The plaintiff claims he was never warned by any of the companies about the dangers of using asbestos-containing products and subsequently developed mesothelioma as a result of his prolonged exposure to the carcinogen. The asbestos cancer lawsuit claims the defendants owed the plaintiff a duty to warn him about the dangers of asbestos, which were known to the companies, but instead chose not to take reasonable safety precautions to prevent foreseeable injury.

Asbestos was once commonly used in a variety of industrial, military, and construction applications because of the mineral’s heat resistant properties and ability to be shaped into almost any form to fit the required task. Companies manufactured and marketed their asbestos-containing products for decades despite knowing full well that the asbestos fibers in their materials could pose serious health risks to innocent people trying to do their jobs and provide for their families.

One of the most serious health complications associated with asbestos exposure is developing mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that affects the thin linings of tissue surrounding the lungs, abdomen, and heart. After being exposed to enough asbestos to induce the disease, it can take anywhere from 20 to 50 years before symptoms manifest themselves to the point that doctors are able to make a diagnosis.

Unfortunately, there is no definitive cure for mesothelioma and patients are often left with diminished treatment options once a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis is made by their doctor. By filing an asbestos cancer lawsuit, victims and their families can not only hold asbestos companies responsible for their indifference to public safety, but also recover much needed monetary compensation for lost wages, hospital expenses, future medical bills, and the pain and suffering of living with the disease.

Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Virginia Supreme Court Allows Take-Home Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit to Proceed

The Virginia Supreme Court recently issued an important ruling in an asbestos cancer lawsuit allowing the plaintiffs to continue with their claim on behalf of their decreased mother who passed away due to exposure to toxic asbestos dust. The 4-3 decision affirms long standing tort law in the state, establishing a duty to defendants to exercise reasonable care to prevent foreseeable injuries to persons within the scope of harm.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, originally filed in a Virginia circuit court but later moved to a federal District Court, the victim developed her deadly cancer after years of exposure from asbestos fibers brought home on her father’s clothes. The complaint alleged that the victim, who was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2013 and died three years later, regularly helped launder her father’s clothes, who worked as a at Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock, a business now known as Huntington Ingalls Inc., routinely brought home asbestos dust on his clothing.

Asbestos is a naturally forming mineral once commonly used in a variety of industrial, commercial, and military capabilities, particularly in the shipping industry, because of its heat resistant properties. The substance is directly linked to developing mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer commonly affecting the thin linings of tissue surrounding the vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen.

It was only until the 1970s that Congress took action to protect the public, passing laws that effectively banned the use of asbestos. Despite knowing full well about the risks associated with asbestos exposure, companies produced their asbestos-laden products without any warning to consumers about the risks of developing serious health conditions.

After removing the case from Virginia circuit court to federal District court, the federal justices asked for guidance from the Virginia Supreme Court on aspects of Virginia civil laws, specifically on the question of whether the defendants owed any duty to the plaintiff. The defense argued that the victim had no relationship to the shipyard as a child of an employee there and could therefore not claim any duty to exercise caution against foreseeable harm.

Fortunately for the plaintiffs carrying on the suit on the victim’s behalf, the majority of the Virginia Supreme Court that state law held the harm to the deceased was in fact foreseeable and the defendants owed a duty of care. While the ruling did not find judgement for one party or another, it is significant that allows the case to proceed in federal District Court to trial where a judge and jury will decide the merits of the case.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Children of Mesothelioma Patient Win Right to Continue Wrongful Death Claim After Father’s Passing

 The adult children of a man who passed away from mesothelioma recently won a huge court victory when an appeals court upheld a lower court’s ruling allowing the group to proceed with their own wrongful death claims against asbestos companies they say are responsible for their father’s passing. The case is another classic example of asbestos companies and other negligent parties avoiding responsibility for their indifference to public safety and compensating victims and their families for the harm incurred.

The case began years ago when the plaintiff filed his mesothelioma cancer lawsuit in a California Superior Court against several defendants, accusing the group of manufacturing and marketing asbestos contaminated products that caused his mesothelioma cancer diagnosis. The plaintiff was able to settle his asbestos cancer claims with all but two of the defendants, Elementis Chemicals, Inc. and Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), and eventually went to trial to hold the remaining parties accountable.

The jury eventually ruled in favor of the plaintiff, apportioning some of the blame to Elementis Chemicals and UCC, for which the two defendants would receive some credit since other parties already settled cases with the plaintiffs, effectively reducing the amount they owed the plaintiff. During an appeal, the victim passed away from mesothelioma and the plaintiff’s wife was able to settle the claims with Elementis Chemicals.

However, during the appeal, the plaintiff’s adult children filed their own wrongful death claims against Elementis Chemicals for the loss of their father’s company. The defendants claimed the plaintiff’s wife was acting on behalf of the deceased’s estate as well as the children and they should be forced to abide by the terms of the settlement reached with the deceased’s spouse.

The case made its way to the California Court of Appeals where the justices hearing the case dismissed the defendants’ argument, holding that the agreements reached between Elementis Chemicals and the plaintiff’s spouse could not negate the childrens’ claims. The justices also pushed back on the defendants’ assertion that the surviving children should try to recoup any of the settlement money from the plaintiff’s wife.

While wrongful death and survivor action claims vary from state to state, the law generally gives rights to the estate of deceased persons who pass away due to the negligence of another party. Either family members can file their own claims for the loss of companionship and support of a loved one or effectively continue the claim for the deceased’s injuries on his or her behalf. Depending on the situation, mesothelioma cancer lawsuits can recover compensation for lost wages, pain and suffering, and medical bills.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced nationwide mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

Johnson & Johnson Faces Three More Talcum Powder Asbestos Cancer Trials

Pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson is facing three more asbestos cancer lawsuit trials across the country over allegations that the company’s talcum-based products caused various types of cancers developed by the plaintiffs. Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier, Imerys Talc USA, have recently lost a series of trials in which juries handed down substantial verdicts in favor of plaintiffs to compensate the victims for their mesothelioma cancer diagnoses.

In California, attorneys for both sides will soon give their closing arguments in an asbestos talcum powder cancer trial in a Los Angeles Superior Court room. In that case, the plaintiffs represent the estate of the cancer victim who allegedly passed away from a mesothelioma diagnosis brought on by years of using talcum powder products produced by Johnson & Johnson and sourced with materials from Imerys.

In South Carolina, Johnson & Johnson will soon give its opening statements in a talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuit and will do the same a week later in a Middlesex County Superior Court in New Jersey. Those two upcoming trials also allege that Johnson & Johnson and talc supplier Imerys Talc USA knowingly produced and sold talcum powder products contaminated with asbestos fibers.

While talc itself does not contain asbestos, the two minerals are naturally forming and often found in deposits side by side one another, which creates the real possibility of asbestos contamination if special precautions are not taken. Once used in a variety of industrial and commercial applications for its heat resistant properties, asbestos has been heavily regulated by the federal government since the 1970s because of the health consequences associated with exposure.

Asbestos exposure is directly linked to mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that usually affects thin linings of tissue surrounding vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdominal cavity. Despite worldwide research efforts to fight the disease, there is no definitive cure for the disease, and the cancer’s long latency period means patients are often left with diminished treatment options by the time doctors make a diagnosis.

Even though nothing can undo a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis, victims can file asbestos cancer lawsuits to recover vital compensation to pay for medical treatment and hold companies like Johnson & Johnson responsible for knowingly producing a carcinogenic product. After a recent trial in Missouri, a state court jury awarded 22 plaintiffs and their family members a combined total of $4.69 billion in compensatory damages and punitive damages in their claim against Johnson & Johnson. The trial judge in that particular case also upheld the jury’s award, finding no reason why the verdict should not stand.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Colgate-Palmolive Settles Talcum Powder Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit

Personal care products company Colgate-Palmolive recently reached a settlement with a California man in a talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuit on the verge of trial in state Superior Court. The terms of the settlement were not released in the case of the now 67-year-old man who claimed he developed his disease as a result of years of using talc-based products developed and sold by the defendant, which formerly did business as the Mennen Co. The two-sides resolved the case during a lunch break after spending several days selecting a jury for trial.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed his mesothelioma cancer after decades of using asbestos-contaminated talcum powder products marketed by Colgate-Palmolive and Menen Co. The plaintiff claimed the defendant knew fully well about the asbestos contained in its Mennen Baby Powder but did nothing to warn consumers about the risks associated with exposure to the deadly carcinogen.

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer directly linked to asbestos exposure. The disease can take several decades to show symptoms, known as the latency period, and commonly affects the thin linings of tissue surrounding vital organs like the lungs, abdomen, and heart. Due to the long latency period, mesothelioma patients often have diminished treatment options which can complicate the prognosis of their condition. While research continues on searching for a cure for the disease, none exists at this time.

Colgate-Palmolive, which acquired Mennin Co. in 1992, argued in court papers that their talc-based products never contained asbestos and that there is no reliable scientific evidence linking such exposure to mesothelioma. While talcum powder companies often make such defense claims, lawsuits across the country have revealed these corporations knew full well that their products were contaminated with asbestos.

Talc and asbestos are both naturally occurring minerals often found in deposits adjacent to one another, which can lead to talc contamination if care is not taken to separate the two substances from one another. Although federal law has required talc to be asbestos-free for many decades now, plaintiffs in talcum powder asbestos lawsuits allege that independent testing shows the talc sourced for Johnson & Johnson products still contains asbestos to this day.

Across the country, thousands of individuals have filed talcum powder cancer lawsuits against pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies like Colgate-Palmolive and Johnson & Johnson, as well as talc suppliers like Imerys Talc. These lawsuits allege plaintiffs developed serious forms of cancer like mesothelioma and ovarian cancer as a result of the defendant’s knowingly producing a carcinogenic product. Recently, a New Jersey state jury handed down a $117 million verdict in favor of a plaintiff who claimed talcum powder caused his mesothelioma diagnosis.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

 

California Appeals Court Issues Reversal to Allow Family to Pursue Damages in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

A California appeals court recently issued a ruling in an asbestos cancer lawsuit allowing the plaintiffs to have their case reheard and pursue additional damages which were improperly excluded from consideration by the trial court. The case is being brought by the seven surviving children of the deceased who passed away after a battle with mesothelioma which the plaintiffs claim was a direct result of exposure to asbestos-laden products sold by Pep Boys auto parts stores.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in Francisco City and County Superior Court, the plaintiff was a “do it yourselfer” who frequently performed his own work on his vehicle, including changing brake pads made with asbestos and sold by Pep Boys from the 1960s through the mid-1980s. Throughout the course of repairing and replacing his brakes, which included brushing brake dust from auto wheel drums, grinding or sanding brake shoes, handling core brake parts, and sweeping up brake dust, the victim inhaled friable asbestos dust.

As a result of decades of exposure to and inhaling asbestos fibers, the plaintiff developed mesothelioma and received a diagnosis for such in April 2010 and ultimately succumbed to the illness just three months later at the age of 75. In January 2011, the deceased’s adult children filed a mesothelioma lawsuit on his behalf against Pep Boys, claiming the company knowingly sold a dangerous product and was therefore responsible for the cancer diagnosis.

Mesothelioma is a rare and deadly form of lung cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. The mineral was once used in a variety of industrial and commercial applications but has been heavily regulated by the government since the 1970s. Still, thousands of people receive mesothelioma cancer diagnoses every year due to the disease’s long latency period.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs asked to be compensated for the loss of services the deceased would have otherwise provided when caring for the children’s’ sick mother. At trial, the judge hearing the case excluded taking those loss of services into consideration for award, which constituted the base of the appeal by the plaintiffs.

In their decision, the appellate court ruled that the trial judge erred in refusing to consider awarding compensation for the loss of home health care services to the deceased’s wife, determining those were economic damages. As a result of the appeals court ruling, the plaintiffs may now go back to the trial court to have their damages reconsidered to include the value of the loss of household services the deceased would have provided.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.