Category Archives: Blog

California Jury Awards $3 Million to Pipefitter in Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit

A Southern California jury recently awarded a former pipefitter and his wife $3 million in an asbestos cancer lawsuit brought against a contractor whom the plaintiff claims frequently exposed him to asbestos during the course of his employment. The mesothelioma lawsuit claimed that D.W. Nicholson Corp. exposed the plaintiff to asbestos while performing an estimated 100 contracting jobs at the Masonite Corp. in Ukiah, California.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, D.W. Nicholson Corp. installed mechanical, electrical, and piping equipment at Masonite more than 100 times while the plaintiff worked at the site. The plaintiff alleged that D.W. Nicholson frequently exposed the victim to asbestos when the company failed to clean up asbestos-containing debris it left behind and provided no warning to Masonite workers about the risks of exposure.

As a result of years of asbestos exposure from 1964 to 1999, the plaintiff claimed he developed mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer which commonly affects the thin lining of tissue surrounding vital organs like the lungs, heart, and abdominal cavity. Asbestos exposure is directly linked to developing this rare type of cancer, often occurring through industrial exposure in the course of employment or sometimes secondhand when fibers are brought home on work clothing.

The jury found D.W. Nicholson was responsible for 20% of the damages to the victim, while Masonite was responsible for 70%. A third company, J.T. Thorpe and Son, was held responsible for 10% but settled the case with the victim prior to the verdict. D.W. Nicholson was the only named defendant remaining when the jury reached its verdict, meaning it will have to pay 20% of the damages awarded by the jury.

Even though asbestos was not regulated by the federal government until the mid-1970s, companies already knew for decades about the serious health risks posed by using asbestos in their products. Asbestos was a popular choice in a variety of industrial, construction, and military applications for its heat resistant properties and ability to be cast in a variety of shapes to fit the job.

Because asbestos companies knew the health risks and did not provide any warning to workers or consumers, the law generally gives these parties the right to file asbestos cancer lawsuits and recover compensation for any damages. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the law gives plaintiffs in civil lawsuits the right to recover for their hospital expenses, lost wages, future medical care, and the pain and suffering of living with an injury.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

Court Allows Construction Worker’s Mesothelioma Lawsuit Against Boiler Company to Continue

A New York City judge recently handed down an important ruling in a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit allowing the plaintiff’s claim against a boiler company to continue rebuffing the defendant’s legal maneuvers to have the case dismissed before it could be heard by a jury. Attorneys for defendant Kohler Co. asked the judge to throw out the case on summary judgement, claiming there was a similar case in New York’s asbestos courts, which barred the plaintiffs from suing the company.

The case was brought by a retired clean up crew worker who worked from 1958 to 1966 and was responsible for removing boiler parts manufactured by Kohler Co. after they had been disassembled. The plaintiff eventually developed mesothelioma and filed a lawsuit against Kohler Co., claiming that he frequently came in contact with frayed gaskets that contained asbestos. The plaintiff ultimately passed away after his battle with mesothelioma in 2016, leaving his estate to take up the claim in court.

In their mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, the plaintiffs claimed that Kohler Co. should have known that maintenance companies would repair and replace boilers with parts manufactured with deadly asbestos fibers. In their motion for summary judgement, attorneys for the defendant pointed out that Kohler Co. did not manufacture the asbestos-laden parts itself and that the removal of parts after dismantling was not a foreseeable use of the product and that therefore the company owed no duty of care to anybody who was carrying parts away.

Kohler Co.’s attorneys went on to cite a New York asbestos lawsuit ruling in favor of defendants sued by a salvage worker who claimed he developed mesothelioma in the course of his duties tearing down and removing asbestos-contaminated materials. In that case, the judge ruled that the defendants could not be held liable because they could have no way of knowing their products would be treated in such a rough and careless manner.

However, the judge in the case of this clean up crew worker dismissed the defendant’s argument, pointing out the differences between the scope of work done by maintenance and salvage workers. The judge noted that Kohler Co. should have known their products would need replacement and repair by persons skilled in the process and therefore should have taken action to prevent foreseeable harm.

While asbestos has been effectively banned from use for many decades, it was once extremely popular in a variety of industrial and construction applications, particularly in boilers and steamfitting. Unfortunately, many workers did not know about the hidden risks of asbestos exposure and developed mesothelioma and other serious health conditions as a result.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

Jury Awards $25 Million in Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit

A California jury recently handed down a substantial award to a husband and wife who claim the man’s employer is responsible for his mesothelioma diagnosis developed while working at several of the defendant’s oil refineries over a two-decade period. The mesothelioma cancer lawsuit named Fluor Enterprises Inc., Middle East Fluor, the National Iranian Oil Company, and several other companies as defendants, claiming that the groups exposed the victim to carcinogens by using asbestos-laden products despite knowing of the risks to workers.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed an especially rare form of testicular mesothelioma as a result of working with asbestos contaminated parts as part of his routine job duties on oil rigs. The plaintiffs claimed the defendants violated their own internal standards for safety in the process of completing those projects, cutting many corners and putting the victim and other workers at risk of asbestos exposure.

The Los Angeles jury ultimately sided with the plaintiffs, handing down a total of $25 million in compensatory damages to the couple. Of that award, $14 million was awarded to the husband for his past and future pain and suffering while the remaining $11 million went to the wife for her damages as a result of her spouse’s mesothelioma diagnosis. In apportioning liability to the defendants, the jury determined the Iranian National Oil Company to be 20% at fault and prescribed the remainder of the blame to the Flour companies.

The case was interesting for several reasons, the least of which was that some of the defendants were foreign companies being sued in U.S. courts for asbestos exposure which occurred overseas. When hearing these types of claims, California, as many other states do, applies the applicable law of the state or country where the injury occurred. In this case, the court had to grapple with Iranian civil law interpretation of negligence and liability, among other concerns.

Asbestos was once commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry because of the mineral’s heat resistant properties and ability to be molded into a variety of shapes to fit various applications. While the asbestos-containing parts might have worked well for their application, when the products did break down, they put unsuspecting workers at risk of exposure to a deadly carcinogen directly linked to developing a rare and deadly form of cancer.

Mesothelioma typically affects the thin lining of tissue surrounding the lungs, abdomen, and heart but can be known to affect other parts of the body as it did in this particular case. There is currently no known cure for the disease and patients are often left with diminished treatment options when a diagnosis is made.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

Georgia Family Files Asbestos Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson After Losing Mother to Mesothelioma

A grieving Georgia family recently filed an asbestos talcum powder cancer lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson after losing their mother to a battle with mesothelioma in 2017 that they claim was caused by the pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant’s negligence. The family’s lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and its supplier, Imerys Talc USA, comes just shortly after a report by Reuters detailed a review of thousands of internal company documents showing that the defendants knew for decades about asbestos contamination in its talcum powder products.

According to the talcum powder mesothelioma lawsuit, the victim used talc-based products manufactured by Johnson & Johnson and supplied by Imerys Talc USA that were contaminated with deadly asbestos fibers. Despite knowing full well about the presence of asbestos in its talcum powder products and the risks it could pose to consumers, the defendants declined to provide the public with any warnings on the product labels, according to the lawsuit.

The mesothelioma cancer lawsuit is another in an increasingly long list of claims filed against the company by defendants, mostly women, who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma as a result of using Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products. Currently, there are an estimated 12,000 other talcum powder cancer lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson pending in state and federal courts, with several slated for trial in 2019.

Johnson & Johnson has thus far refused to settle any of the lawsuits against it and instead has opted to take the claims in front of juries. A recent report by Reuters claims that the company had testing done, both internally and by outside labs, that showed asbestos contamination in its talc supply. Despite the revelations, Johnson & Johnson continues to maintain that its talc-based products are safe for human consumption and remains steadfast in its denying liability in pending lawsuits.

Both talc and asbestos are naturally occuring minerals, often found in deposits side by side one another. Because of this phenomenon, talc sourcing companies must take great care when mining the talc or otherwise risk asbestos contamination in the supply. Asbestos itself was once commonly used in a variety of industrial and commercial products for its heat resistant properties and ability to be molded into a variety of shapes.

An asbestos talcum powder cancer lawsuit can recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering of living with mesothelioma. In cases in which the victim may have passed away, the law generally gives family members the right to continue the claim on behalf of the deceased and recover damages from negligent partites.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment.

California Jury Hands Down $29 Million Verdict in Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit Trial

An Oakland, California jury recently handed down a substantial $29 million verdict in favor of a female plaintiff who claims she developed a serious form of cancer from carcinogens in talc-based products produced by the defendant, Johnson & Johnson. The plaintiff’s verdict is the latest defeat for the pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant, which is still reeling from several other awards handed down by juries last year totaling more than $5 billion in compensatory and punitive damages.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Alameda County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed mesothelioma as a result of years of exposure to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder, which is made with talc sourced by Italy-based Imerys Talc USA. The talc supplier avoided any liability in the matter due to a recent Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing which Imerys claims is the result of the weight of talcum powder cancer lawsuits filed against it.

Although talc does not contain asbestos itself, the two are both naturally occurring minerals found in deposits side by side one another. If talc suppliers and manufacturers do not take reasonable precautions to separate talc from asbestos and conduct necessary testing, innocent consumers may be exposed to life threatening carcinogens.

With Imerys Talc being tentatively excused from all current talcum powder cancer trials, Johnson & Johnson now faces an estimated 12,700 talc cancer lawsuits as the sole defendant, leaving it potentially liable for billions in total damages. Making matters worse for Johnson & Johnson, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice are both investigating the company over allegations that internal company documents show executives knew for decades about the risk of asbestos exposure but did nothing to warn the public.

The revelations over Johnson & Johnson’s internal communications come after an investigation by Reuters, which analyzed thousands of pages of documents going back decades that seem to show the company knew about its talc testing positive for asbestos. As expected, Johnson & Johnson has denied all the allegations made in the Reuters article and has appealed jury verdicts against it, claiming the science applied to testing its talc-based products is not valid.

In July 2018, a Missouri state jury in St. Louis handed down a massive $4.7 billion verdict on behalf of 22 women and their families who claim they developed various forms of cancer as a result of using Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products like Baby Powder and Shower to Shower. In all of 2018, juries across the country handed down a combined total of over $5 billion in compensation to victims and their families. Johnson & Johnson faces even more scheduled trials in 2019, but does not appear poised to resolve the matters en masse.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

 

California Jury Hears Closing Arguments in Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit

A California jury recently heard closing arguments in an asbestos cancer lawsuit brought by a plaintiff who claims she developed mesothelioma as a result of years of exposure from carcinogens in talc-based products produced by Johnson & Johnson. The trial is one of the first of many the pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant will face this year by itself after codefendant and minerals supplier Imerys Talc USA was dismissed from many of the cases after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in federal court.

According to the asbestos lawsuit, filed in Oakland court, the plaintiff used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder since the 1960s, never knowing it may have been contaminated with deadly asbestos fibers. The plaintiff’s lawyers pointed to Johnson & Johnson internal company documents which allegedly show that the company knew for decades about the presence of the carcinogenic mineral but placed no warnings on labels to inform consumers of the risks.

In its defense, Johnson & Johnson’s lawyers attempted to obfuscate blame by asserting the materials could not be reliable since they were decades old and the authors of those reports were not able to come and testify on the matter. Johnson and Johnson faces an estimated 13,000 other talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuits in state and federal courts across the country brought by victims who claim they suffer from debilitating health conditions as a result of the company knowingly providing a dangerous product.

Although talc does not contain asbestos itself, the two are both naturally occurring minerals often found in deposits next to each other. If talc suppliers do not exercise due caution when mining or processing talc, it may be contaminated with asbestos fibers and potentially harm innocent people. Talc is used in a variety of cosmetics products, particularly in hygiene products traditionally marketed to women and persons of color.

Mesothelioma is one of the most serious health conditions associated with exposure to asbestos. The disease is a rare and deadly type of cancer that grows tumors in thin linings of tissue surrounding vital organs like the lungs, heart, and abdominal cavity. There is no known cure for mesothelioma as of yet, and patients are often left with limited treatment options after a diagnosis is made due to the disease’s latency period, which can last anywhere from 20 to 50 years.

By filing a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, victims and their family members can recover vital compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and other economic damages. Additionally, plaintiffs may be entitled to compensation for the physical pain and suffering of undergoing treatment and living with a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

 

Sixth Talcum Powder Asbestos Cancer Trial Against J&J Set to Begin in California

The sixth talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuit against pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson is set for trial in a matter of days and will take place in a California state court to determine whether or not the company is liable for the victim’s injuries. The mesothelioma cancer lawsuit also names cosmetics company Chanel and talc supplier Imerys Talc USA as defendants for also producing carcinogenic products the plaintiff claims contributed to her terminal cancer diagnosis.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed mesothelioma as a result of years of asbestos exposure from using Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower, along with Chanel’s No. 5 After Bath Powder. The lawsuit claims both the companies’ products were manufactured with talc supplied from Imerys, which the parties knew to be contaminated with asbestos.

Johnson & Johnson faces thousands of other lawsuit across the country in which plaintiffs allege their serious medical conditions, including mesothelioma and other cancers, were caused by talc-based products produced by the company. The talcum powder cancer lawsuits claim Johnson & Johnson and its supplier were fully aware of the dangers posed by its talcum powder products but did not put any warning labels on packaging to alert consumers to the dangers.

Many of the estimated 9,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits allege the female plaintiffs developed ovarian cancer from use of Johnson & Johnson talcum powder products while others allege they developed mesothelioma. Although talc itself does not contain asbestos, the two minerals are naturally occuring and often found in deposits side by side one another. Asbestos has been heavily regulated by federal laws since the 1970s but if talc suppliers do not take special precautions when mining talc, the substance could be contaminated with asbestos.

Asbestos is linked to a whole host of serious health conditions, the most well known of which is mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that commonly affects the thin linings of tissues surrounding vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen. Even as researchers across the world continue to make strides in medical advancements to treat the disease, there is still no known cure for the condition.

By filing an asbestos cancer lawsuit, victims can hold large asbestos companies responsible for their indifference to public safety and send a message the behavior will not be tolerated. Furthermore, a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit can recover lost wages while out of work as well as vital compensation to pay for necessary medical treatment to fight the disease and live a more comfortable, dignified life.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Texas Aircraft Mechanic Files Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit Against Employer and Parts Suppliers

An aircraft mechanic from Texas and his wife recently filed a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit against the husband’s former employer and its parts supplier claiming the defendants are responsible for the victim’s malignant cancer diagnosis. The asbestos cancer lawsuit names Lockheed Martin Corp., 3M Co., and General Dynamics Corp. as parties responsible for the plaintiff’s mesothelioma diagnosis and seeks damages for the victim’s medical bills, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas, the victim worked for approximately 40 years as an aircraft mechanic for Lockheed Martin Corp. after graduating high school in 1963. During that time, he was frequently exposed to deadly levels of asbestos fibers in products used, manufactured, and sold by the defendants.

The plaintiff claims he was never warned by any of the companies about the dangers of using asbestos-containing products and subsequently developed mesothelioma as a result of his prolonged exposure to the carcinogen. The asbestos cancer lawsuit claims the defendants owed the plaintiff a duty to warn him about the dangers of asbestos, which were known to the companies, but instead chose not to take reasonable safety precautions to prevent foreseeable injury.

Asbestos was once commonly used in a variety of industrial, military, and construction applications because of the mineral’s heat resistant properties and ability to be shaped into almost any form to fit the required task. Companies manufactured and marketed their asbestos-containing products for decades despite knowing full well that the asbestos fibers in their materials could pose serious health risks to innocent people trying to do their jobs and provide for their families.

One of the most serious health complications associated with asbestos exposure is developing mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that affects the thin linings of tissue surrounding the lungs, abdomen, and heart. After being exposed to enough asbestos to induce the disease, it can take anywhere from 20 to 50 years before symptoms manifest themselves to the point that doctors are able to make a diagnosis.

Unfortunately, there is no definitive cure for mesothelioma and patients are often left with diminished treatment options once a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis is made by their doctor. By filing an asbestos cancer lawsuit, victims and their families can not only hold asbestos companies responsible for their indifference to public safety, but also recover much needed monetary compensation for lost wages, hospital expenses, future medical bills, and the pain and suffering of living with the disease.

Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Virginia Supreme Court Allows Take-Home Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit to Proceed

The Virginia Supreme Court recently issued an important ruling in an asbestos cancer lawsuit allowing the plaintiffs to continue with their claim on behalf of their decreased mother who passed away due to exposure to toxic asbestos dust. The 4-3 decision affirms long standing tort law in the state, establishing a duty to defendants to exercise reasonable care to prevent foreseeable injuries to persons within the scope of harm.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, originally filed in a Virginia circuit court but later moved to a federal District Court, the victim developed her deadly cancer after years of exposure from asbestos fibers brought home on her father’s clothes. The complaint alleged that the victim, who was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2013 and died three years later, regularly helped launder her father’s clothes, who worked as a at Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock, a business now known as Huntington Ingalls Inc., routinely brought home asbestos dust on his clothing.

Asbestos is a naturally forming mineral once commonly used in a variety of industrial, commercial, and military capabilities, particularly in the shipping industry, because of its heat resistant properties. The substance is directly linked to developing mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer commonly affecting the thin linings of tissue surrounding the vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen.

It was only until the 1970s that Congress took action to protect the public, passing laws that effectively banned the use of asbestos. Despite knowing full well about the risks associated with asbestos exposure, companies produced their asbestos-laden products without any warning to consumers about the risks of developing serious health conditions.

After removing the case from Virginia circuit court to federal District court, the federal justices asked for guidance from the Virginia Supreme Court on aspects of Virginia civil laws, specifically on the question of whether the defendants owed any duty to the plaintiff. The defense argued that the victim had no relationship to the shipyard as a child of an employee there and could therefore not claim any duty to exercise caution against foreseeable harm.

Fortunately for the plaintiffs carrying on the suit on the victim’s behalf, the majority of the Virginia Supreme Court that state law held the harm to the deceased was in fact foreseeable and the defendants owed a duty of care. While the ruling did not find judgement for one party or another, it is significant that allows the case to proceed in federal District Court to trial where a judge and jury will decide the merits of the case.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Children of Mesothelioma Patient Win Right to Continue Wrongful Death Claim After Father’s Passing

 The adult children of a man who passed away from mesothelioma recently won a huge court victory when an appeals court upheld a lower court’s ruling allowing the group to proceed with their own wrongful death claims against asbestos companies they say are responsible for their father’s passing. The case is another classic example of asbestos companies and other negligent parties avoiding responsibility for their indifference to public safety and compensating victims and their families for the harm incurred.

The case began years ago when the plaintiff filed his mesothelioma cancer lawsuit in a California Superior Court against several defendants, accusing the group of manufacturing and marketing asbestos contaminated products that caused his mesothelioma cancer diagnosis. The plaintiff was able to settle his asbestos cancer claims with all but two of the defendants, Elementis Chemicals, Inc. and Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), and eventually went to trial to hold the remaining parties accountable.

The jury eventually ruled in favor of the plaintiff, apportioning some of the blame to Elementis Chemicals and UCC, for which the two defendants would receive some credit since other parties already settled cases with the plaintiffs, effectively reducing the amount they owed the plaintiff. During an appeal, the victim passed away from mesothelioma and the plaintiff’s wife was able to settle the claims with Elementis Chemicals.

However, during the appeal, the plaintiff’s adult children filed their own wrongful death claims against Elementis Chemicals for the loss of their father’s company. The defendants claimed the plaintiff’s wife was acting on behalf of the deceased’s estate as well as the children and they should be forced to abide by the terms of the settlement reached with the deceased’s spouse.

The case made its way to the California Court of Appeals where the justices hearing the case dismissed the defendants’ argument, holding that the agreements reached between Elementis Chemicals and the plaintiff’s spouse could not negate the childrens’ claims. The justices also pushed back on the defendants’ assertion that the surviving children should try to recoup any of the settlement money from the plaintiff’s wife.

While wrongful death and survivor action claims vary from state to state, the law generally gives rights to the estate of deceased persons who pass away due to the negligence of another party. Either family members can file their own claims for the loss of companionship and support of a loved one or effectively continue the claim for the deceased’s injuries on his or her behalf. Depending on the situation, mesothelioma cancer lawsuits can recover compensation for lost wages, pain and suffering, and medical bills.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced nationwide mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.