Category Archives: Blog

Texas Aircraft Mechanic Files Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit Against Employer and Parts Suppliers

An aircraft mechanic from Texas and his wife recently filed a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit against the husband’s former employer and its parts supplier claiming the defendants are responsible for the victim’s malignant cancer diagnosis. The asbestos cancer lawsuit names Lockheed Martin Corp., 3M Co., and General Dynamics Corp. as parties responsible for the plaintiff’s mesothelioma diagnosis and seeks damages for the victim’s medical bills, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas, the victim worked for approximately 40 years as an aircraft mechanic for Lockheed Martin Corp. after graduating high school in 1963. During that time, he was frequently exposed to deadly levels of asbestos fibers in products used, manufactured, and sold by the defendants.

The plaintiff claims he was never warned by any of the companies about the dangers of using asbestos-containing products and subsequently developed mesothelioma as a result of his prolonged exposure to the carcinogen. The asbestos cancer lawsuit claims the defendants owed the plaintiff a duty to warn him about the dangers of asbestos, which were known to the companies, but instead chose not to take reasonable safety precautions to prevent foreseeable injury.

Asbestos was once commonly used in a variety of industrial, military, and construction applications because of the mineral’s heat resistant properties and ability to be shaped into almost any form to fit the required task. Companies manufactured and marketed their asbestos-containing products for decades despite knowing full well that the asbestos fibers in their materials could pose serious health risks to innocent people trying to do their jobs and provide for their families.

One of the most serious health complications associated with asbestos exposure is developing mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that affects the thin linings of tissue surrounding the lungs, abdomen, and heart. After being exposed to enough asbestos to induce the disease, it can take anywhere from 20 to 50 years before symptoms manifest themselves to the point that doctors are able to make a diagnosis.

Unfortunately, there is no definitive cure for mesothelioma and patients are often left with diminished treatment options once a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis is made by their doctor. By filing an asbestos cancer lawsuit, victims and their families can not only hold asbestos companies responsible for their indifference to public safety, but also recover much needed monetary compensation for lost wages, hospital expenses, future medical bills, and the pain and suffering of living with the disease.

Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Virginia Supreme Court Allows Take-Home Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit to Proceed

The Virginia Supreme Court recently issued an important ruling in an asbestos cancer lawsuit allowing the plaintiffs to continue with their claim on behalf of their decreased mother who passed away due to exposure to toxic asbestos dust. The 4-3 decision affirms long standing tort law in the state, establishing a duty to defendants to exercise reasonable care to prevent foreseeable injuries to persons within the scope of harm.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, originally filed in a Virginia circuit court but later moved to a federal District Court, the victim developed her deadly cancer after years of exposure from asbestos fibers brought home on her father’s clothes. The complaint alleged that the victim, who was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2013 and died three years later, regularly helped launder her father’s clothes, who worked as a at Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock, a business now known as Huntington Ingalls Inc., routinely brought home asbestos dust on his clothing.

Asbestos is a naturally forming mineral once commonly used in a variety of industrial, commercial, and military capabilities, particularly in the shipping industry, because of its heat resistant properties. The substance is directly linked to developing mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer commonly affecting the thin linings of tissue surrounding the vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen.

It was only until the 1970s that Congress took action to protect the public, passing laws that effectively banned the use of asbestos. Despite knowing full well about the risks associated with asbestos exposure, companies produced their asbestos-laden products without any warning to consumers about the risks of developing serious health conditions.

After removing the case from Virginia circuit court to federal District court, the federal justices asked for guidance from the Virginia Supreme Court on aspects of Virginia civil laws, specifically on the question of whether the defendants owed any duty to the plaintiff. The defense argued that the victim had no relationship to the shipyard as a child of an employee there and could therefore not claim any duty to exercise caution against foreseeable harm.

Fortunately for the plaintiffs carrying on the suit on the victim’s behalf, the majority of the Virginia Supreme Court that state law held the harm to the deceased was in fact foreseeable and the defendants owed a duty of care. While the ruling did not find judgement for one party or another, it is significant that allows the case to proceed in federal District Court to trial where a judge and jury will decide the merits of the case.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Children of Mesothelioma Patient Win Right to Continue Wrongful Death Claim After Father’s Passing

 The adult children of a man who passed away from mesothelioma recently won a huge court victory when an appeals court upheld a lower court’s ruling allowing the group to proceed with their own wrongful death claims against asbestos companies they say are responsible for their father’s passing. The case is another classic example of asbestos companies and other negligent parties avoiding responsibility for their indifference to public safety and compensating victims and their families for the harm incurred.

The case began years ago when the plaintiff filed his mesothelioma cancer lawsuit in a California Superior Court against several defendants, accusing the group of manufacturing and marketing asbestos contaminated products that caused his mesothelioma cancer diagnosis. The plaintiff was able to settle his asbestos cancer claims with all but two of the defendants, Elementis Chemicals, Inc. and Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), and eventually went to trial to hold the remaining parties accountable.

The jury eventually ruled in favor of the plaintiff, apportioning some of the blame to Elementis Chemicals and UCC, for which the two defendants would receive some credit since other parties already settled cases with the plaintiffs, effectively reducing the amount they owed the plaintiff. During an appeal, the victim passed away from mesothelioma and the plaintiff’s wife was able to settle the claims with Elementis Chemicals.

However, during the appeal, the plaintiff’s adult children filed their own wrongful death claims against Elementis Chemicals for the loss of their father’s company. The defendants claimed the plaintiff’s wife was acting on behalf of the deceased’s estate as well as the children and they should be forced to abide by the terms of the settlement reached with the deceased’s spouse.

The case made its way to the California Court of Appeals where the justices hearing the case dismissed the defendants’ argument, holding that the agreements reached between Elementis Chemicals and the plaintiff’s spouse could not negate the childrens’ claims. The justices also pushed back on the defendants’ assertion that the surviving children should try to recoup any of the settlement money from the plaintiff’s wife.

While wrongful death and survivor action claims vary from state to state, the law generally gives rights to the estate of deceased persons who pass away due to the negligence of another party. Either family members can file their own claims for the loss of companionship and support of a loved one or effectively continue the claim for the deceased’s injuries on his or her behalf. Depending on the situation, mesothelioma cancer lawsuits can recover compensation for lost wages, pain and suffering, and medical bills.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced nationwide mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

Johnson & Johnson Faces Three More Talcum Powder Asbestos Cancer Trials

Pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson is facing three more asbestos cancer lawsuit trials across the country over allegations that the company’s talcum-based products caused various types of cancers developed by the plaintiffs. Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier, Imerys Talc USA, have recently lost a series of trials in which juries handed down substantial verdicts in favor of plaintiffs to compensate the victims for their mesothelioma cancer diagnoses.

In California, attorneys for both sides will soon give their closing arguments in an asbestos talcum powder cancer trial in a Los Angeles Superior Court room. In that case, the plaintiffs represent the estate of the cancer victim who allegedly passed away from a mesothelioma diagnosis brought on by years of using talcum powder products produced by Johnson & Johnson and sourced with materials from Imerys.

In South Carolina, Johnson & Johnson will soon give its opening statements in a talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuit and will do the same a week later in a Middlesex County Superior Court in New Jersey. Those two upcoming trials also allege that Johnson & Johnson and talc supplier Imerys Talc USA knowingly produced and sold talcum powder products contaminated with asbestos fibers.

While talc itself does not contain asbestos, the two minerals are naturally forming and often found in deposits side by side one another, which creates the real possibility of asbestos contamination if special precautions are not taken. Once used in a variety of industrial and commercial applications for its heat resistant properties, asbestos has been heavily regulated by the federal government since the 1970s because of the health consequences associated with exposure.

Asbestos exposure is directly linked to mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that usually affects thin linings of tissue surrounding vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdominal cavity. Despite worldwide research efforts to fight the disease, there is no definitive cure for the disease, and the cancer’s long latency period means patients are often left with diminished treatment options by the time doctors make a diagnosis.

Even though nothing can undo a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis, victims can file asbestos cancer lawsuits to recover vital compensation to pay for medical treatment and hold companies like Johnson & Johnson responsible for knowingly producing a carcinogenic product. After a recent trial in Missouri, a state court jury awarded 22 plaintiffs and their family members a combined total of $4.69 billion in compensatory damages and punitive damages in their claim against Johnson & Johnson. The trial judge in that particular case also upheld the jury’s award, finding no reason why the verdict should not stand.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Colgate-Palmolive Settles Talcum Powder Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit

Personal care products company Colgate-Palmolive recently reached a settlement with a California man in a talcum powder asbestos cancer lawsuit on the verge of trial in state Superior Court. The terms of the settlement were not released in the case of the now 67-year-old man who claimed he developed his disease as a result of years of using talc-based products developed and sold by the defendant, which formerly did business as the Mennen Co. The two-sides resolved the case during a lunch break after spending several days selecting a jury for trial.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed his mesothelioma cancer after decades of using asbestos-contaminated talcum powder products marketed by Colgate-Palmolive and Menen Co. The plaintiff claimed the defendant knew fully well about the asbestos contained in its Mennen Baby Powder but did nothing to warn consumers about the risks associated with exposure to the deadly carcinogen.

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer directly linked to asbestos exposure. The disease can take several decades to show symptoms, known as the latency period, and commonly affects the thin linings of tissue surrounding vital organs like the lungs, abdomen, and heart. Due to the long latency period, mesothelioma patients often have diminished treatment options which can complicate the prognosis of their condition. While research continues on searching for a cure for the disease, none exists at this time.

Colgate-Palmolive, which acquired Mennin Co. in 1992, argued in court papers that their talc-based products never contained asbestos and that there is no reliable scientific evidence linking such exposure to mesothelioma. While talcum powder companies often make such defense claims, lawsuits across the country have revealed these corporations knew full well that their products were contaminated with asbestos.

Talc and asbestos are both naturally occurring minerals often found in deposits adjacent to one another, which can lead to talc contamination if care is not taken to separate the two substances from one another. Although federal law has required talc to be asbestos-free for many decades now, plaintiffs in talcum powder asbestos lawsuits allege that independent testing shows the talc sourced for Johnson & Johnson products still contains asbestos to this day.

Across the country, thousands of individuals have filed talcum powder cancer lawsuits against pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies like Colgate-Palmolive and Johnson & Johnson, as well as talc suppliers like Imerys Talc. These lawsuits allege plaintiffs developed serious forms of cancer like mesothelioma and ovarian cancer as a result of the defendant’s knowingly producing a carcinogenic product. Recently, a New Jersey state jury handed down a $117 million verdict in favor of a plaintiff who claimed talcum powder caused his mesothelioma diagnosis.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

 

California Appeals Court Issues Reversal to Allow Family to Pursue Damages in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

A California appeals court recently issued a ruling in an asbestos cancer lawsuit allowing the plaintiffs to have their case reheard and pursue additional damages which were improperly excluded from consideration by the trial court. The case is being brought by the seven surviving children of the deceased who passed away after a battle with mesothelioma which the plaintiffs claim was a direct result of exposure to asbestos-laden products sold by Pep Boys auto parts stores.

According to the mesothelioma cancer lawsuit, filed in Francisco City and County Superior Court, the plaintiff was a “do it yourselfer” who frequently performed his own work on his vehicle, including changing brake pads made with asbestos and sold by Pep Boys from the 1960s through the mid-1980s. Throughout the course of repairing and replacing his brakes, which included brushing brake dust from auto wheel drums, grinding or sanding brake shoes, handling core brake parts, and sweeping up brake dust, the victim inhaled friable asbestos dust.

As a result of decades of exposure to and inhaling asbestos fibers, the plaintiff developed mesothelioma and received a diagnosis for such in April 2010 and ultimately succumbed to the illness just three months later at the age of 75. In January 2011, the deceased’s adult children filed a mesothelioma lawsuit on his behalf against Pep Boys, claiming the company knowingly sold a dangerous product and was therefore responsible for the cancer diagnosis.

Mesothelioma is a rare and deadly form of lung cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. The mineral was once used in a variety of industrial and commercial applications but has been heavily regulated by the government since the 1970s. Still, thousands of people receive mesothelioma cancer diagnoses every year due to the disease’s long latency period.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs asked to be compensated for the loss of services the deceased would have otherwise provided when caring for the children’s’ sick mother. At trial, the judge hearing the case excluded taking those loss of services into consideration for award, which constituted the base of the appeal by the plaintiffs.

In their decision, the appellate court ruled that the trial judge erred in refusing to consider awarding compensation for the loss of home health care services to the deceased’s wife, determining those were economic damages. As a result of the appeals court ruling, the plaintiffs may now go back to the trial court to have their damages reconsidered to include the value of the loss of household services the deceased would have provided.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Former Aircraft Mechanic Files Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit

A former Illinois aircraft mechanic recently filed an asbestos cancer lawsuit against several defendants the plaintiff claims are responsible for the lung cancer diagnosis he received in 2017 after decades of exposure to the deadly carcinogen. The mesothelioma cancer lawsuit names CBS Corporation, General Electric, John Crane Inc., Honeywell International, Union Carbide Corporation, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company as defendants.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in St. Clair County Circuit Court, the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos while he worked as an aircraft mechanic from 1963 to 2011. The lawsuit claims the defendants either manufactured or installed asbestos products to which the plaintiff was exposed during his career. The plaintiff further alleges that the defendants knew full well that their asbestos-laden products were harmful to workers but chose not to warn him or others of the dangers.

Asbestos was once used in a variety of industrial applications for its heat-resistant and malleable properties, which made it ideal for numerous uses. Unfortunately, the once-popular insulation material is directly linked to developing deadly cancers, including mesothelioma. Despite knowing for decades about the risks associated with exposure to asbestos, companies continued to manufacture and install these products to the detriment of innocent people simply trying to earn a living and support themselves and their families.

Common occupations associated with asbestos exposure include steel, automotive, and other industrial jobs, drywall workers, pipefitters, gasket makers, and workers at power plants and shipyards. Asbestos exposure is particularly associated with occupations where workers cut, install, or manufacture insulation made with the substance and account for many of the mesothelioma lawsuits filed in the courts.

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that commonly affects the thin linings of tissues surrounding vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen. The disease occurs when victims inhale asbestos fibers from contaminated substances. There is no definitive cure for mesothelioma and due to a latency period that can be anywhere from 20 to 50 years, patients are often left with diminished treatment options by the time their physicians diagnose their illness.

Although nothing can undo the harm caused by a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis, patients can recover much-needed compensation to pay for vital medical treatment and make up for lost wages by filing asbestos cancer lawsuits. Filing a claim can recover past and future medical bills, lost wages, compensation for pain and suffering, and the emotional distress of living with the disease. Furthermore, filing a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit helps to hold asbestos companies responsible for their negligence and send a message that our communities will not tolerate indifference to public safety.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

 

California Jury Hands Down $11.4 Million Award in Take Home Asbestos Lawsuit

A California jury recently handed down a substantial verdict in an asbestos cancer case involving a plaintiff who developed mesothelioma as a result of secondhand exposure to asbestos fibers brought home on his father’s work clothes. The jury’s $11.4 million award included $5 million to the plaintiff and his wife for what the panel deemed to be malice on the part of the defendant, Liberty Utilities, now known as Park Water.

Mesothelioma is a rare form of cancer that commonly affects thin lining of tissue surrounding vital organs like the lungs, heart, and abdomen. The disease is directly linked to exposure to asbestos, a naturally occuring mineral once commonly used in a variety of industrial, commercial, and military applications due to its malleability and heat-resistant properties. Mesothelioma usually takes 20 to 50 years to develop, which can leave patients with limited treatment options by the time a diagnosis is made.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the plaintiff developed his cancer as a result of being exposed to asbestos fibers his father unknowingly brought home from his job at Liberty Utilities (Park Water). The plaintiff’s father worked at Liberty Utilities (Park Water) from 1970 to 1985, where he cut, installed, and repaired asbestos-cement water pipes but was unaware of asbestos exposure and its dangers.

The plaintiffs alleged that the victim’s mesothelioma diagnosis could have been prevented had Liberty Utilities (Park Water) taken basic safety precautions, such as providing separate lockers for work and street clothing and warning employees about the risks of doing their jobs. However, the defendants did not give the plaintiff’s father any such warnings in the 15 years he worked for the utility company, according to the lawsuit.

The jury’s award included $856,500 in lost wages and $2,550,000 for loss of enjoyment of life, mental anguish, and pain and suffering to the plaintiff for his injuries. The jury also awarded the plaintiff’s wife $3,000,000 for loss of consortium which includes the deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries caused by the defendant’s negligence.

Of great significance was the jury’s $5,000,000 punitive damages award for the malice it determined that the defendant acted with for its failure to warn employees about the risks of asbestos exposure. While not a common occurrence in civil cases, punitive damages are handed down by juries as a means to punish defendants for especially egregious conduct and serve as a deterrent for others to act in a similarly negligent manner.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Daughter of Wisconsin Asbestos Victim Files Lung Cancer Lawsuit

The daughter of an asbestos cancer victim who passed away from his disease recently filed asbestos lung cancer Illinois state court against her father’s employer and several other defendants alleging the companies failed to exercise due care. The asbestos lung cancer lawsuit names Buffalo Air Handing Inc., Cooper Industries LLC, URS Corp. and others as defendants and seeks compensation for the victim’s wrongful death.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in St. Clair County Circuit Court, the victim developed his lung cancer from decades of working with asbestos contaminated products produced and/or distributed by the defendants. The plaintiff’s lawsuit alleges that the defendants knew of the risks associated with products containing asbestos but made a conscious decision not to inform the plaintiff and others of the risks associated.

The victim received his lung cancer diagnosis in December 2017 and passed away soon after in February 2018, at which point the victim’s daughter continued the suit on his behalf to recover compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of his estate. Sadly, many other asbestos cancer victims suffer the same fate as the one in this case where they are given little time left to live and pursue justice against those who caused their irreversible condition.

Asbestos is commonly found as a flaky white mineral and was once used in wide variety of industrial and commercial applications due to its heat-resistant properties. Although the federal government did not start to regulate the sale and use of asbestos until the 1970s, companies knew for decades about the risks of asbestos exposure but did nothing to warn workers and consumers about the dangers.

Even though nothing can undo the effects of an asbestos related lung cancer diagnosis, the law gives victims and their surviving family members the legal right to file mesothelioma cancer lawsuits and hold wrongdoers responsible for their careless actions. Filing claims can recover compensation for damages such as medical treatment, hospital bills, lost wages, and the pain and suffering of living with the disease. Furthermore, many companies also have set aside money in asbestos trusts for claimants to draw from in cases the companies go bankrupt.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced Arizona mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.

 

Family of Texas Petroleum Worker Files Mesothelioma Cancer Lawsuit Against Phillips 66

The family of a deceased Texas petroleum worker recently filed a mesothelioma cancer lawsuit against the victim’s employer, Phillips 66, over allegations that the company knew about dangerous working conditions, including asbestos exposure, but did nothing to warn employees. The plaintiffs’ lawsuit asks the court to award exemplary damages (sometimes referred to as punitive damages) for what they deem to be especially egregious behavior on the part of the defendant.

According to the asbestos cancer lawsuit, filed in Jefferson County District Court, the deceased worked from 1955 to 1979 for Phillips Petroleum at the company’s Bogner facility as an insulator, during which time he was exposed to asbestos. As a result of the exposure to asbestos, the victim developed mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer that commonly affects the body’s vital organs like the heart, lungs, and abdomen. In January 2017, the victim passed away due to his condition, which the lawsuit alleges was a painful experience.

The plaintiffs claim that Phillips Petroleum was well aware of the dangers employees faced while working with asbestos and other carcinogens but did not put in place reasonable safety measures to prevent foreseeable health consequences or warning employees about the risks. This indifference to worker safety was tantamount to an act of malice, and Phillips Petroleum should therefore be subject to severe punishment, according to the plaintiffs.

Industrial Jobs and Risk of Asbestos

 Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral once used in a variety of industrial, commercial, and military applications for its heat-resistant properties and ability to be formed into almost any shape to meet the appropriate application. Unfortunately, the widespread use of asbestos in insulation, pipe fitting, and gasket making exposed tens of thousands of innocent men and women to the very real dangers of developing mesothelioma.

Although use of asbestos has been heavily regulated by the federal government since the mid-1970s, companies had known for decades about the serious health risks associated with asbestos exposure but did nothing to warn employees or consumers. Now, decades later, thousands of people receive a mesothelioma diagnosis each year, which is directly linked to the exposure they endured in years past.

While nothing can undo the harm of a mesothelioma cancer diagnosis, filing a lawsuit can help recover much needed compensation for vital medical care and lost wages incurred while battling the disease. Furthermore, an asbestos cancer lawsuit can hold wrongdoers accountable for creating their harmful products and knowingly exposing the public to a known carcinogen just for the sake of turning a profit and increasing a company’s bottom line.

Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer

 If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, contact our office to speak to one of our experienced nationwide mesothelioma attorneys about your situation. Our office can help investigate your case and determine if compensation can be sought from negligent parties to help pay for your medical treatment to help you and your family live a more comfortable life.